Growing replacement organs

It’s very exciting to discover that the day may soon be here when we can grow bespoke replacement organs, using our own cells.

According to the London Times, scientists at the University of Minnesota have chemically stripped cells from a dead animal’s heart. This leaves only the inert protein base structure intact. This can then be used as the base for seeding with fresh, live cells from the patient. At the moment, it’s only been used on animals. However, in the future, we’ll be able to use hearts from cadavers, seed them with stem cells, and pretty rapidly - within weeks - have a functioning heart ready for transplant. It isn’t just hearts, either - almost any organ can be ‘created’ using this procedure.

Of course, the process still needs a real, human heart to provide the base. I suppose that it needn’t be as ‘fresh’ as the hearts currently used for transplant, so by providing a bigger time window between the death of the donor and the time the organ is removed from the cadaver. Also, all issues regarding compatibility and organ rejection become irrelevant.

The scientists who have developed the procedure say that it will be many years before this is ready for use on humans, but I’m not so sure - I think there’s such a huge demand amongst the boomer generation for it that money will be thrown at the problem, and the delivery date will arrive much sooner!

January 13th, 2008, posted by Emlyn

Augmented vision

Related to my recent post about the blurring of real and virtual worlds, I’m interested to read another development in the field. A company called Lumus is demonstrating spectacle-mounted video screens; I’m not sure whether they have wi-fi, but if not, later versions surely will. Then… well, let’s say we will be able to really enjoy living in a data-rich environment. Perhaps.

January 6th, 2008, posted by Emlyn

China will change us

The more I read, the more I realize that those of us in the “Western” world really don’t understand what’s happening in China, and how it’s going to rewrite the rules whether we like it or not. This is partly to do with technological development, but even more so with the culture around tech and communications.

For example, I’m going to Beijing next year to teach e-commerce. I already have the textbook, which is based - as you would probably expect - on the Western (largely US) history of e-commerce. Yet, reading blogs, tech news sites, and so on, I’m beginning to see that the way the Chinese are approaching e-commerce is going to be rather different.

I’ve been mulling this over for a while, but Niti’s post on Chinese aid to Africa has spurred to finally blog it! As she suggests, this is all about design insight drawn from market experience. China has a vast market with no pre-existing infrastructure, a hunger for Western-style affluence, and third-world budgets. Since Chinese factories already make pretty much everything for everyone in every cost range, the manufacturing capacity is present to make vast numbers of anything that can be designed to target this market.

This is leading to design innovation through rapid evolution: make lots of different designs, get them onto the market, and see what works. It produces products that are cheap, effective, and demand-driven - rather than overdesigned and over-marketed “solutions”. Result: Chinese-designed tech products that are only intended for the domestic markets, and yet find a world-wide demand - because they’re affordable and meet real needs.

As Niti’s post shows, this means that it’s Chinese-designed technology that’s being sought out in other developing countries. This is important as we go into 2008, I think, because all the indications are that the US, and perhaps Europe, will experience an economic slowdown or recession. However… the indications also seem to show that the rest of the world will not. The BRIC economies, for example, will carry on doing just fine and, since China in particular will continue to need raw materials, other developing countries will also continue to do well.

So what does this all mean? China will become the technological focus of attention for much of the world… I’m curious as to whether Chinese tech culture will also be exported, because it seems that this is where there are significant differences from the West. Some examples:

  • Massively distributed collaborative tasks: Rick Martin on C|Net discusses guerrilla translation projects for pirated films. How else could this culture be harnessed or adapted? It would seem to be an open-source dream… Could it be used for coding? Design?
  • A crowd philosophy. Chinese internet culture is developing along the lines of constant presence. As Professor Guo Liang of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences outlines in a very interesting interview:

    The interesting thing is that in China about more than 30% Internet users don’t have an email account. Less than 30% of those who have an email account check their emails every day. It does not necessarily mean that they don’t communicate with others. They prefer instant contact by QQ, which is a Chinese version of ICQ. People used to only have address on their business cards. Then, they have phone numbers or even fax numbers. And then, they have email address. Now, many people put their QQ account number on their business cards.

  • Let’s not kid ourselves: the future of internet access in China is phone-based. As Professor Guo also says:

    Firstly, I would say Internet use is growing very fast in China. Currently, there are about 123 million users in China, ranking the second largest Internet country in the world after the US. Secondly, there is the issue of the digital divide, which many Western scholars are interested in. In theory, rich people and better educated people are more likely to need a computer and they can afford it. So they may access more information and may have more opportunities to get even richer. But I think the digital divide is not mainly because of digital but economy. According to my research in small towns, a lot of people don’t have to buy a computer. They just go to the Internet café for RMB 1 (US$0.12) per hour. In large cities, it’s something like RMB3 per hour

    So: most Chinese internet users don’t have their own computer, they use a cybercafe. When they get to the stage where they want to go online outside a cybercafe, I suspect they are most likely to want to do this via a mobile phone - because they already have one, they regularly upgrade it, and in most of China it’s the only available communications technology. This extremely interesting CNN article shows how competitive and ambitious the mobile market is in China.

Now this is where I get speculative. As we can see, the trends are that:

  • Chinese internet users are most likely to be online through their phone, which they have with them at all times;
  • Chinese internet culture is such that users like to be constantly connected to their friends, and are open to approaches from strangers;
  • Chinese tech culture is increasingly collaborative and distributed.
  • Chinese tech manufacturers are predisposed to developing lots of different technologies and throwing them into the market to see what works.

Now I want to throw into the mix something I wrote about before: augmented reality and extended consciousness. The technology exists, and is about to hit market at a fairly low price, to turn the internet into something we are immersed in, 24/7. It’s western-developed, and - I think - still searching for a niche outside uber-geeks. Very largely, it seems that it’s being directed at gamers. In mainstream western cyberculture, we’re still thinking of the social web in terms of Facebook etc, sites you go to visit; the immersive internet is not likely to catch on.

Once gaming brings this technology to China, I suspect we might see very different results. The Chinese internet experience is already immersive; this will just take it to a new level. Can this technology be adapted for phone-based internet access? I suspect we’ll see Chinese manufacturers and service providers willing to give it a try. Will it take off? Who knows. It seems to have a good chance of success.

If it does take off… it will be something unlike we’ve seen before. And let’s not forget where this article began: other developing countries are adopting Chinese technologies and trends, because it’s affordable and meets their needs.

December 29th, 2007, posted by Emlyn

The machines will speak your thoughts

OK, so it’s been a while since I posted, and I’m trying to catch up with a number of things that I’ve bookmarked, and so I’m getting creative with the post titles…

Anyway, the BBC reports that researchers at Boston University have developed a brain implant that is able to read thoughts and translate them into machine-generated speech.

The article reassures us:

“There is a huge difference between a technique like this, which is able to pick up signals the subject wants to be picked up, and being able to delve deep into the mind,” says Professor John Dylan Haynes of the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences.

However, it wasn’t all that long ago that the technology to control mouse a computer by thought alone also required a chip to be implanted in the brain - now, though, it’s a $15 accessory. In the same way, I suspect that this thought-to-speech technology will also rapidly become a cheap peripheral - and no doubt governments around the world will soon have black labs working on using them in combination with truth drugs…

November 18th, 2007, posted by Emlyn

Telepathy for $15

Yes, another title to tease you into reading, promising more than it can deliver. I’m at that head-shaking point where I can’t quite believe what I’ve just seen.In an interview about his latest novel, novelist William Gibson points out that writing science fiction is getting harder, because:

we can’t culturally have futures the way that we used to have futures because we don’t have a present in the sense that we used to have a present. Things are moving too quickly for us to have a present to stand on from which we can say, “oh, the future, it’s over there and it looks like this.”

Here’s the perfect example:

Neurosky, a company that will let us interact with games (and tools, and machinery, and robots, and cellphones…) just by controlling our mental state, blinking, and so on through a device that will be on the market next year - and should only add $15 to the price… Incredible… who thought it would come so soon? And look at how portable the device is! Combine this with the kind of augmented reality I was talking about the other day, and we will soon be seeing some wild stuff happening out there on the streets! Are we ready for this, I wonder…? I also wonder: when will they go to IPO….?

Here’s that augmented reality clip again: watch this back-to-back with the above, and imagine the possibilities when they’re combined….

Update:

My word, and those 3-d avatars of yourself that I mentioned in that earlier post… hehehe, I should have known: they’re going to be on the market later this year!

September 6th, 2007, posted by Emlyn